<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on waste to energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urbanimpact.com/blog/waste-to-energy/more-on-waste-to-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urbanimpact.com/blog/waste-to-energy/more-on-waste-to-energy/</link>
	<description>Urban Impact Vancouver Recycling: Office Paper &#38; Commercial Cardboard Recycling &#38; Shredding Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 05:22:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://www.urbanimpact.com/blog/waste-to-energy/more-on-waste-to-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urbanimpact.com/blog/?p=39#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I think the waste to energy concept is a good one. It seems to be working very well in Copenhagen and Paris. I was pleasantly suprised to hear that with better emission controls the air quality can actually be cleaner next to a waste energy plant than further away from one. As a long term goal for waste management I believe this is something we should definately look into here in the lower mainland. The expense of building one is a major concern. 500 million to a billion dollars with a net revenue of 10 million a year. At that rate it will be paid off in 50 years!! Not a great ROI ...yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the waste to energy concept is a good one. It seems to be working very well in Copenhagen and Paris. I was pleasantly suprised to hear that with better emission controls the air quality can actually be cleaner next to a waste energy plant than further away from one. As a long term goal for waste management I believe this is something we should definately look into here in the lower mainland. The expense of building one is a major concern. 500 million to a billion dollars with a net revenue of 10 million a year. At that rate it will be paid off in 50 years!! Not a great ROI &#8230;yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

